Contributing to the Fight for the Proper Historical Memory of Reconstruction

"Fellow citizens: I am not indifferent to the claims of a generous forgetfulness, but whatever else I may forget, I shall never forget the difference between those who fought for liberty and those who fought for slavery; between those who fought to save the Republic and those who fought to destroy it." - Frederick Douglass

"We fell under the leadership of those who would compromise with truth in the past in order to make peace in the present and guide policy in the future." - W.E.B. Du Bois

"The traditions of all dead generations weighs like a nightmare upon the brains of the living." - Karl Marx

It may seem odd that I post a paper on Reconstruction but I would beg to differ and argue that the issue is very relevant to American politics today and always has been.   It brings up the role of the federal government, grassroots struggles, civil rights, expanding democracy, the historical significance of Barack Obama's election, and the horrible discussion and attachment in the mainstream media of this "team of rivals" theory of Lincoln's cabinet and advisory staff.  I especially think this is important because of the frighteningly popular grip the "Lost Cause" view of the Civil War (and Reconstruction) has on Americans today.  As Studs Terkel commented about Americans having worse "amnesia" than himself, a 90+ year old man, for not picking Lincoln as our greatest president (and also not having FDR in the top 10) in a recent national survey.  

There are important political implications for this, but to boil it down simply - its the effect of the North's capitulation (due to the rising domination and coopting of the Republican party by purely profit-driven capital interests) to the interests of Southern whites (particular the power of the elites),  films like "the Birth of a Nation" and "Gone With the Wind" and the resurgence of the Klan in the 1920's; and the recent wave of reaction ignited by the Nixon presidency and accelerated in the actual reactionary fervor that was the Reagan presidency and the coalition of greedy yuppies, white racist fundamentalists, and military hawks.  Its a view of the civil war that nitpicks at any criticism of the Union (or outright fabricates or exaggerates some) and conveniently ignores any flaws of the confederacy and somehow glosses over slavery.  They say that the Confederates were not fighting for slavery, but for state's rights or that slavery just had nothing to do with the causes of the Civil War.  They exaggerate military heroism and the strategy of generals (Lee, in particular) and ignore the ideology, political, social, and economic consequences of the greatest revolution of the 19th century.  Not to mention, a very conspicuously selective neglect of black military courage and heroism that would fit and exceed even their standards.  

Anyways, one can begin to see the logical applications of this viewpoint on modern-day American political and social issues.  The idea of "state's rights" is constantly invoked, first to protect Jim Crow, and once that was smashed, to effectively try to reverse as much of the gains of the Civil Rights Movement (and consequently, the labor and women's movements).  It celebrates white planters and ignores the valiant and very worthy of myth and praise struggles of slaves in rebellion, free black troops and abolitionist agitators, and great leaders like Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglass.  To keep it short - which narrative lays claim to popular historical memory has very important implications for American's consciousness and political policy.  

We must be vigilant about celebrating the truth about the Civil War and Reconstruction.  That the war was about slavery, that struggle from the slaves' themselves constituted the largest slave rebellion in world history and led to the emancipation proclamation and black enlistment.  That a president like Abraham Lincoln is the greatest president in United States history, and was far more revolutionary and radical than any of the founding fathers.  Also, that Lincoln would never had been pushed into doing what he did without the courageous political leadership and agitation of Abolitionist and Radical Republican leaders, foremost among them being Frederick Douglass.  We recognize that poor white southerners who fought for the Confederacy saw no material benefit from slavery, however, fighting for the Confederacy was inescapably a fight led by the slaveholding class to form a slave society that aggressively sought to protect and expand slavery and the racial hierarchy of the old order of the South.  There were poor whites in seceding states who resisted their neighbors and the Confederate government to remain loyal to the Union (i.e. West Virginia) - and those should be the only ones venerated.  As you will read in the paper, Radical Reconstruction must be celebrated as an all-too-brief, revolutionary period in American democracy - with politically and economically mobilized freedpeople at the vanguard.  

It's no coincidence that when civil rights struggles are going on in the south there is a corresponding surge in Confederate symbols and celebration of Rebel Heroes to inspire white reaction and maintain the status quo (or turn the clock backwards).  The Confederate flag is a disgusting symbol of genocide, slavery, and a continued commitment to racism and hatred and firmly belongs in the dustbin of history.  Anyways, hopefully you guys read the paper and it is worthy of your time.  It was my final paper for my Civil War Era class, so I put my best effort into it.  This is the first time I've tried this but there will be more to come. 

Here it is: 40 Acres and A Mule

In Solidarity,

-Steve

P.S.  Everyone should also check out Kyle's paper about the Richmond bread riots of 1863.  Not only are the riots an interesting story of Civil War history that shatter the romantic illusions of the Confederacy and old southern society, but that the politics and ideology of the Confederacy were inherently backwards and that struggle from the inside contributed to its downfall.  Anyways, check it: Bread Riots

Interesting Article About my Favorite Night of Television

Finally!  Read this amazing piece of analysis of NBC's thursday night line-up by Alyssa Rosenberg called "My Job is Driving me Crazy!"  It rightly notes what I've been thinking about the shift from the annoying 90's sitcoms that I fucking hated about stupid Manhattan yuppies like Seinfeld, Mad About You, Friends, Frasier (he's in Seattle, I know, but it's the bourgy part!) etc. to the awesomeness that is NBC's thursdays since 2006.  Shows like My Name is Earl, 30 Rock, and my all-time favorite, The Office, that deal with the day-to-day of working people (or in Earl's case underemployed).  Anyways, Rosenberg makes a great argument about how the aforementioned shows reflect American worker's dissatisfaction with their jobs and how work is central to the character's lives and the shows in general, as opposed to the affluent lives of the characters in the 90's sitcoms where work was in the background of the characters and they seemed fulfilled with their careers.  Anyways, a great, interesting read that y'all should definitely check out.

Some Post Election Thoughts, Part 1

I just have to say that tuesday night was really a night to remember and have not experienced much like it in my life.  I'm well aware of the limitations of an Obama presidency, but there is no denying his election marked an historic moment in U.S. history.  In a nation built on slavery and Jim Crow and that's had a post-civil rights era that's seen the more dramatic examples of "silent majorities", anti-busing riots, Hurricane Katrina's, Jena's, and Sarah Palin audiences, we elected our first African American president.  Now, racism is far from over, but what a devastating blow to it!  I had to pinch myself.  

One of the more amazing events of the night are the mass, spontaneous celebrations that followed.  Again - I have never witnessed anything like it in my life.  The excitement over this historic election and the end of the Reagan era was truly inspiring.  Here in Santa Cruz, massive amounts of folks were celebrating in the streets with a constant parade of cars driving down Pacific Ave, honking and cheering.  I really felt like I was part of history, and that we are (hopefully) about to embark on an exciting time of progressive political engagement in America.  If this is not a mandate for far-reaching change, I don't know what is, and I will speak more to this later but I must get ready for to go to my horror film class.

Also, unfortunately, the assholes in Ca came out in droves and passed prop 8 - but I hear there's still a fight ahead so *fingers crossed* and I'm ready to do my part to revoke this discriminatory policy.  Seriously, who would vote for this shit? So let down.

Better days to come!

in solidarity,

-Steve

Sweet

Sweet victory.  America has elected its first black president.  I know we have a long, long way to go, but I feel pretty amazing right now.  Let's keep moving this country forward.

in solidarity,

-Steve

RIP Studs Terkel (1912-2008)

Studs Terkel died this past friday and as a leftist, a history major, and an American this comes as a great loss.  His voice and his work is needed now more than ever.  I've posted Roger Ebert's article and a video from Michael Moore's, The Big One - two of my all-time favorite people reflecting on Studs, as well as Anthony Arnove's article that is less personal and deals greatly with Terkel's social and political life, work and legacy.

To Studs: With Love and Memories - Roger Ebert

A Chronicler of our Side - Anthony Arnove

Could the Tide be Turning?

Let's hope!  A socialist is organizing and running for city council in South County.

Follow me!!!

I am getting better at this blogging thing slowly but surely!  I will first apologize for my horrible formatting and I promise I will figure this out soon.  However, I have just learned of a great blogosphere tool that brings out the inner-stalinist in all of us - following!  In all seriousness though, on the top of my sidebar to the right of this very post is the "following" gadget.  When you read my blog for the first time and automatically fall in love with it and crave it like crack, you just click on the following deal and add this amazing blog and you can now be updated of every fabulous new post I write.  Even better, I will be informed of your loyal service and this will look favorably upon your condition under my coming world reign.  Anyways, if you like it follow me and if you have a blog, I will follow you.  Thanks and tell your friends!

sincerely,

-Steve

Move the Center

I just got back from a great short documentary/lecture/book-signing with Naomi Klein at the Rio Theatre here in Santa Cruz.  All I can say that it was amazing and inspiring and I could think of no one who I would want to hear speak more than her amidst the economic crisis we are in.  If you haven't read The Shock Doctrine yet, I highly suggest you go out and pick it up.  Also, pay attention to her website because she's coming up with an updated piece about the bailout and a whole section of shockdoctrine.org devoted to resources about what's going on.  Anyways, I hope a ball gets rolling here to organize against this last great theft of wealth by the ruling class.

In Solidarity,

-Steve

"Revenge... now that's more motivating than hope." - Naomi Klein 

A Brief Comment on Free Markets

Lose your hard-on for them!  I'm sorry, but the competition and the profit-system can not do anything for human needs.  The financial chaos we are in right now was created because we left the greedy bastards on Wall St. to their own devices.  For- profit health care is the reason why 44 million Americans are uninsured while the rest of us have shitty plans that could bankrupt the majority of Americans in an instant.  Homes are being foreclosed due to real estate speculation and the deregulation of Fannie and Freddie can attest to that.

I'm sorry, I like public education and think that teachers are important.  I think that the money we waste on two wars could go into making those better.  I'm sorry for thinking that a truly democratic government would act in the interests of the people and has done and will do a far better job in creating jobs, providing health care, schools, day care, banks, pensions, homes, infrastructure, libraries etc. than the market has done.  It leaves our lives and our happiness at the whims of their profit, and funnels the wealth we create to speculating, asshole, frat-boy, CEO's at the top.

Redistribute the wealth.  Nationalize Corporations and tax the rich.  Imprison white collar criminals.  Spend, spend, spend our resources to benefit the people.

Get over it.

-Steve

Glenn Beck and the McCain Campaign: Racist Scum.

It's frightening to see the reaction of the right to the rapid decline of McCain in the polls. The video posted below is a recent one from Glenn Beck, who I would consider the worst of the worst in terms of radical right-wing pundits in the mainstream media (and with Lou Dobbs, Sean Hannity, and Bill O'Reilly in that mix that's saying a lot!) Just listen to the growing sense of fear and rage of this right-wing scumbag and his stupid freak friend. Aside from making the horrible argument for free markets and blaming working class and poor Americans for the economic woes brought upon them by the market forces and greedy CEO's and politicians that he loves so much, they go on to personally berate Michelle Obama with overt racist and sexist comments.  Especially saying she’s “Kim Jong Il dressed up like Oprah Winfrey.” 

 

And it’s not just this fringe individual making these racist statements, it’s been a part of the Republican’s “Southern Strategy” that used race-baiting to re-align the parties when Nixon campaigned in 1968 and take the racist, white, dixiecrat voters.  McCain/Palin have stepped up this racist rhetoric and it is garnering a frighteningly frenzied response from their supporters.  Watch the news (except for Fox, who are fanning these flames of racism) and witness the hatred, fear, and rage of this base of crazy honkies.  Even McCain got booed because he was not calling for Obama’s assassination.  And don’t think that makes McCain innocent – it has been his campaign that has stoked these fires that created this zealousness.

We need to be vigilant about challenging racism at every turn in the coming months.  I hope not, but things may start to get violent in this country.  This not only stems from my own observations, but from repeated warnings by moderate commentators and writers and leaders I respect a great deal.  Even Paul Krugman, an economist who pretty much only writes about the economy, especially in the midst of this crisis, had to take a break in his blog and make a post about this rising tide of racial hatred on the right.  He writes:

The crisis isn’t the only scary thing going on. Something very ugly is taking shape on the political scene: as McCain’s chances fade, the crowds at his rallies are, by all accounts, increasingly gripped by insane rage. It’s not just a mob phenomenon — it’s visible in the right-wing media, and to some extent in the speeches of McCain and Palin…

What happens when Obama is elected? It will be even worse than it was in the Clinton years. For sure there will be crazy accusations, and I wouldn’t be surprised to see some violence.

The next few years are going to be very, very tough.

 

Former Civil Rights leader and Democratic Congressman, John Lewis, stood up to the McCain campaign to McCain’s face on the floor of congress and powerfully articulated what they are creating:

"During another period, in the not too distant past, there was a governor of the state of Alabama named George Wallace who also became a presidential candidate. George Wallace never threw a bomb. He never fired a gun, but he created the climate and the conditions that encouraged vicious attacks against innocent Americans who were simply trying to exercise their constitutional rights. Because of this atmosphere of hate, four little girls were killed on Sunday morning when a church was bombed in Birmingham, Alabama.

"As public figures with the power to influence and persuade, Sen. McCain and Gov. Palin are playing with fire, and if they are not careful, that fire will consume us all.”

 

Do me a favor, if you hear a racist comment, joke, or even epithet, don’t let it go unchallenged.  We need to stop this dangerous trend dead in its track. It is not only ignorant, wicked, and backwards as all hell, it creates a climate of violence and oppression.  We have now not only a moral, but an immediate political obligation to confront this. If you need help, contact me or my posse, Beast Crew and the United Front, who recently shut down racist Katie Smith on myspace. Also, personally reprimanding people you know only goes so far, get engaged in anti-racist movements and causes that not only fights extremist racist groups but also advances the struggle against racial inequality in America.  If not, we get more Katrina’s, more Jena’s, and more of this bullshit.

In Solidarity,

-Steve

Miracle at St. Anna

All I can say is go see it!  I know this is two weeks too late but I have been busy with school (but not too busy to see this amazing film the day it came out).  I write with this sense of urgency for a few reasons.  First, it's a great movie by one of my all time favorite directors (Spike Lee) and I wish to pass my enjoyment and recommendation on to others.  Secondly,  it is such an important historical film that finally recognizes the neglected role of African-American soldiers in World War II, and the racism and hypocrisy of this country that they had to persevere through.  St. Anna also gives credit where credit's due by recognizing the contributions of the Italian peasantry and the resistance fighters who also get the historical shaft in the United States. And finally, building off the last point, not enough people are seeing this important movie and it made less money than a stupid, post- Mike Seaver, Kirk Cameron, fundamentalist movie called Fireproof.

Now, I'm not a film critic and there's no way I could write it better than Roger Ebert, whose review you should definitely check out, but I will weigh in on the controversy over the representation of the actual massacre at St. Anna and the Partisans in the film in general.  The other great review by Joe Allen at Socialist Worker, highlights the neglected history of African-American soldiers in World War II and is the first review that I've read to (rightly) bring up the controversy in Italy.  Pro-Partisan/anti-Fascist groups are angry with the film over what they view as the movie's version of the massacre at St. Anna as being provoked by Partisans, in collaboration with the Nazis.  

Now,  they have every reason to be sensitive about this subject, especially since fascism is on the rise again in Italy and Europe in general.  I also agree, that Spike Lee's response was insensitive to say the least.  However, I believe he could have made a better case for his film's treatment of the events in question than just saying "I don't apologize for anything." (For the record, James Mcbride, the author of the novel and the screenwriter did apologize).  

In terms of what was actually on the film, I did not get the perception that the Partisans were bad or collaborator's at all.  In fact I felt quite the opposite.  The Partisans die heroically in battle fighting alongside the African-American soldiers against the Nazis, defending the city.  Nazi military officials discuss their policy of killing 10 Italian villagers for every one Nazi killed by a Partisan, which was historically accurate.  They also express that they are on the hunt for a lead partisan named The Butterfly, and that they have informants in their search for him.  The character, Rodolfo, was either a Partisan who was a horrible traitor and betrayed his comrades in order to collaborate with the Nazis, or was placed there from the beginning as an informant (they allude to his brother having been a fascist).  With both scenarios, Rodolfo, is portrayed as a horrible, selfish, back-stabbing Judas that gets his divine justice 30 years later, as the film reveals at the end.  The actual scene of the massacre was horrifying and displayed the absolute evil and devastation brought about by the Nazis - wherever they were. 

The other aspect that I could see as being controversial is that "the Butterfly" feels guilty about the killing - not because he caused it, but because he feels some sense of guilt for not turning himself in.  These would seem to be the moral questions of any revolutionary guerilla who has to continue his or her fight for the people by remaining clandestine, and sometimes having innocent sympathizers die for that necessary secrecy.  When he discovers that Rodolfo is a traitor, he tries to kill him.  Either way, the controversy is unfortunate, because the fight against racism in the United States is the same as the fight against the far-right in Italy.  Both sides of this controversy should be in solidarity over this movie, but I will concede that Lee should have made the St. Anna massacre clearer, as well as the heroism of the Partisans.  However, this does not negate its importance, especially in this country, whose history and society continue to be blighted by racist untruths and neglect of African-Americans' sacrifice and struggle that we are all better off for today.

-Steve

P.S.  I also saw Michael Moore's, free new documentary called Slacker Uprising.  Go to www.slackeruprising.com to download it free.  It has great right-bashing and cool cameos so yea.  Also, check out Mike's plan for the financial crisis.  He's saying what politicians should be - Main St. needs to be bailed out and that we need a national bank, free from the predatory, insecure, unequal, and unpredictable nature of private banks.

P.S.S.  In less serious movie news, Nick and Norah's Infinite playlist was super sweet and funny.

My peers brilliant insight into racism and life in general...

“Hey, no wonde​r you'​re all singl​e.​

BIRTH​DAY PARTY​ TONIG​HTTT

There​ will be some finee​ee asss bitch​es.​ You shoul​d total​ly come!​

21 and havin​'​ funnn​nnnn !!!”

 

“word to all your friends that will jump down my throat for the political incorrectness of this comment: SUCK IT.”

“the people who matter know that I am colorblind...it was just funny. fuckers.”

“i really didnt expect YOU to stoop this low. when i have never been anything but overly kind and legit with you. youre only bitter and hate life because I am friends with (your ex-girlfriend) and I know where my loyalties lie.  “colorblind", for me, is a good description. so fuck who "usually uses the term". its a song by the counting crows, and the lyrics are perfect. god im glad i dont believe everything i read. youre so ignorant.”

This was all said in a serious argument about racism.  What the hell is going through people’s heads these days?  Everything is reduced to some dumb-shit, non-important, certainly not clever or relevant personal attacks.  I really think that’s how the majority of my college peers see things.  How did everyone get so fucking stupid?  How could anyone be so self-obsessed with such a worthless and uninteresting life?  We talk about racism and you talk about how we can’t party and how we don’t understand “girls”? Is this their thought process about everything…

Racism? Who gives a shit about that. Besides I’m sooo tired of black ppl.

It’s just a girl thing.  We’re just so wildly emotional and irrational that we can be racist if we want, ok?

Anyone who thinks about “politics and equality and all shit” all day must not be getting laid. Party with some sexy bitchesss lzrs.

I just wanna be free to do my own thing, you know?  I wanna starve myself to lose weight to impress boys, and wear more make up to impress boys, and be dumber to impress boys, and waste my time on E at raves to meet boyz.

I actually just met the most amazing guy.  He totally knows how to have fun and he’s in an amazing electronic group that srsly changed my life.  Haven’t you heard “rub your ass in my face”? He put it on a mixtape…A MIXTAPE!!!

Why can’t you keep an open mind?  So what if he’s a date-rapist. You don’t know my history, you don’t know me, fuck off and get laid with us sexy slutssss.

I’m sorry I don’t believe everything I read and you know that cuz I don’t read anything! You ignorant virgin pc lzr.  When have politics gotten anyone laid with fine bitchesss?

I hate people. fuck.

-Steve

Thomas Frank: Obama, Get Your Class War On!

Good article, along the lines of what I was saying earlier but more articulate and constructive. Basically, Obama and the Democrats pandering to the right wing, especially with this "post-partisan" excuse, not only doesn't help working Americans but even allows some of the most outrageous friends of big business and laissez-faire capitalism paint themselves as populists and get away with it!  Republicans never pander leftward while Democrats post-LBJ consistently capitulate to the right.  Why? They consistently remain highly organized and principled reactionaries and its time to start swinging back, remaining true to our progressive principles, and not letting Obama get away with his rightward pandering. 

 

I'm still voting for him because I believe he does represent a positive change in attitude with the American people, has it in him (we've seen it in major speeches) to effectively and articulately analyze and challenge racism and neoliberalism, and as corny as it sounds, the first African-American president is significant considering that in the whole history of this country there have only been 5 black senators (Obama being one of them) and I don't want to be on the wrong side of history. But this doesn't mean when he's elected everything will change, we need a strong ground movement that keeps a torch to Washington's ass and ushers in an era of far-reaching reform.  Lincoln would have been nothing without the tireless work of the Abolitionists, FDR's New Deal would have been impossible without the New Deal coalition with the CIO and CP, and the Civil Rights Act would have never passed without Martin Luther King Jr. and the Civil Rights Movement.  Hell, even take Obama's words for it - change comes to Washington, not from it.  

Like Lincoln, FDR, and Johnson,  I believe Obama could be a candidate most receptive to this change and usher in a new era of needed government activism.  But for every powerful progressive speech he has made, there are five more Wall St. lobbyists and conservative pollsters at his side telling him to "play it safe".  Will he take the middle road or make history? Time will tell, but I can guarantee that nothing will change without a principled, popular, groundswell of a movement that holds Obama accountable and maybe will even embolden him to really fight the entrenched interests of Washington and Wall St.  Anyways, I totally digressed, really read Thomas Frank's article right below this.

Fighting Back, From the Bottom Up

Posted using ShareThis

In Solidarity,

-Steve

"Bipartisan" Gridlock

I swear to god if I hear the words "non-partisan" or "bipartisan" again I'm going to murder myself.  I know that there are a lot more important issues to be written about currently, but I just have to rant about this to get back into my blogging groove.  How in the hell are these such popular buzzwords in such crucial times and why would anyone just be begging for more democratic paralysis and capitulation to right wing rule?  Now I would consider myself too progressive to be called a Democrat, but the prospect of Democratic control of both houses of congress and our first African-American president excites me.  What isn't exciting is when they continue to bend over backwards to please these right wing assholes even when they are in the minority in both houses and have a terribly unpopular president out of the white house in just a few months.  

As of recently, Obama and Biden have stepped up the rhetoric against McCain, but why are they still using terms like "bipartisan".  In the past thirty years in American politics that equals Democrats giving up and moving to the right on an issue or bill.  If Obama wins the election his party will control two branches of the government at a time of great crisis in this country.  Imagine what would have happened in 1932 if FDR pandered to the right or "saw both sides of the spectrum," there'd be no hundred days, no New Deal and Americans would have sunk even deeper into depression with no hope of climbing out.  There's a right wing and a left wing for a reason: they represent opposing interests and opposing political viewpoints and platforms.  There's nothing wrong with that.  It's exciting, it's needed, it's a powerful objective to rally behind.  

The radical, pro-corporate, de-regulatory platform of the Republican party that has dominated Washington since the 1970's is what got us into this mess (this is not to excuse the two Democratic presidents within this period who did nothing to stand up to Republican congresses and followed their lead instead).  The American people should be out in the streets demanding the heads of these Fat Cat Wall Street speculators and their cronies in Washington, and at the very least, supporting the opposing party's first exciting candidate since the 60's.  I say there should be a voter rebellion and would gladly welcome every Republican congressman/senator up for re-election being purged, McCain getting his ass handed to him, and every Supreme Court justice dying in Obama's first term and having him stack it with partisan-left judges.  That would get rid of the gridlock and there'd be a wave of government activism that this country has not seen in too many years and has so sorely needed.  There's nothing wrong with action or with standing up and telling those who lead us into this disaster that they are wrong.

At least there has been a shift back to Obama leading but the margin is still far too thin for where it should be.  Unfortunately, I believe the reason for this is the "culture war" politics that the Republican Party, Evangelical Churches, and Media mouthpieces have been so effective at propagating.  There's absolutely no other reason this race should be this close.  How else could such an obviously terrible choice of a Vice President as Sarah Palin actually activate such a mass of people and pull the Republican back into this race?  Poking fun at big cities and community organizers are coded racist signals sent to whites in small towns, the south, and the suburbs who fear diversity.  And they went for it.  Poor and working whites who have suffered daily at the hands of the ultra-right economic policies of the past eight years of Bush have absolutely nothing to gain by voting in the same party for four more years.  This should be as clear as day to them, yet the polls are still close and they still choose to cling to their racism and fundamentalism while they drown.  I hope my cynicism is proven wrong, but the polls being this close in these times is just outrageous.  The American people themselves need to continue to organize and pressure our government for more far reaching change and if Obama wants to win, he should take his cue from the people, be emboldened by it, and drive these points home.  He seems to have been going in the right direction recently and I hope he steps it up even further and stops pandering with weak "bipartisan" rhetoric.

In Solidarity,

-Steve

Office Season Finale

I haven't had enough discussion about "Goodbye, Toby" the fourteenth, and final, episode of the fourth Office season, but from what I gather it seems to be a controversial issue. So I thought I'd put my two cents in.

I thought it was fucking great. I know we were all really excited for Jim to propose to Pam, but that was just another surprise among many. The best part had to be how most of the characters broke out of their shells and behaved differently than normal. Angela was dethroned from her authoritarian reign of the Party Planning Committee while Phyllis, who typically gets pushed around by Angela, takes over and becomes empowered in the process and organizes an amazing party for that asshole, Toby Flenderson. Phyllis knocking Angela's shit off her desk as a response to Angela shredding needed information was a definitely hilarious highlight.

Let's see, there was shell breaking all over the place. Dwight was told by Michael to stop being such a mindless sycophant and to have thoughts of his own and Dwight, being such a mindless sycophant in response, follows Michael's orders and begins to think for himself and disagree with Michael. Asshole Toby, who is so obsessed with Pam that he needs to get a picture with her before he leaves, raises his voice for the very first time, pleading for a camera. This is precisely why Toby is such a wiener. The only reason he finally started standing up for himself was his petty jealousy of Jim's relationship with Pam. So after getting all this needless shit from Michael over the years, he turns on Jim instead, by moving on his girl and becoming a corporate stooge and reporting him to Ryan. Jim has been nothing but nice to Toby! Anyways, it will be weird around the office without him but honestly, I won't miss him much.

Jim Halpert is one of my all-time favorite tv characters and seeing him stand up for himself and stick it to Ryan was amazing. Add that the list of his qualities. Also, him and Pam are just so cute and awesome together. Seeing Pam so happy and Jim being so supportive of her going to graphic design school (something Roy never did) warmed my heart. The one real disappointment of the episode, while funny, was Andy's ridiculous proposal to Angela which interrupts Jim's would-be sweet, romantic, and just perfect proposal to Pam. Pam's heartbreak was, well.... heartbreaking. I really think they should have gone through with the proposal, I can't think of a better situation for it, but atleast we have something to look forward to next season, right? Plus, it sets up the very interesting twist of Andy and Angela's engagement, that is bound to fail, as we saw in the scandalous last scene of Angela getting railed by Dwight in her cubicle!

Alright I've gone on too long so I'll just lump the highlights together. First, how evil is Jan? Artificially inseminating herself while she dated Michael because she was so paranoid her child would carry some of his traits? Honestly, an affair with her ex-personal assistant/rocker, Hunter, would have been nicer than this insulting, eugenics-inspired move. Michael finally found a woman (Holly) that not only could tolerate his antics, but is even responsive to them. It was disappointing to see Michael give in an attempt to be involved in Jan's pregnancy. He needs to get over her and get with Holly! I'm pretty sure this will develop in the next season. It was also awesome to see Ryan's, coc-snorting, corporate fraud committing ass fall from grace and get arrested. Jim's humiliating voicemail, rubbing it in, was icing on the cake. Finally, Dwight convincing Holly that Kevin was retarded, Dwight, Mose and Meredith putting a raccoon in Holly's car, Michael dancing with glee in anticipation of Toby's permanent departure to Costa Rica, Jim's phone-switch prank on Dwight, Creed not remembering what he did on the job and a bunch of other stuff were fucking hilarious. "Goodbye, Toby" was an amazing end to the season.

Anyways, I know this episode is contested and feel free to respond to this in my comments and make this a lively debate!

tell your friends,
-Steve

Holy Shit

I made a blog! I figured I might want to enter the blogosphere and write more - I heard some suckas get paid for this shit.  I doubt I will but hopefully some folks will read it.  Anyways, I'm just testing this thing out right now but there will be blogs soon! possible topics include:  Batman, Barack Obama, hating on college, missing my girlfriend, the Office Season finale, living with Matticus Moogs and other things.  I swear I will get to it forthcoming audience! I must now go create you by whoring this on myspace!

in solidarity,
-Steve